Commit 1abc4b20 authored by Dirk Brandewie's avatar Dirk Brandewie Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq / intel_pstate: remove idle time and duration from sample and calculations

Idle time is taken into account in the APERF/MPERF ratio calculation
there is no reason for the driver to track it seperately.  This
reduces the work in the driver and makes the code more readable.

Removal of the tracking of sample duration removes the possibility of
the divide by zero exception when the duration is sub 1us

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56691Reported-by: default avatarMike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 559f56c7
...@@ -48,12 +48,7 @@ static inline int32_t div_fp(int32_t x, int32_t y) ...@@ -48,12 +48,7 @@ static inline int32_t div_fp(int32_t x, int32_t y)
} }
struct sample { struct sample {
ktime_t start_time;
ktime_t end_time;
int core_pct_busy; int core_pct_busy;
int pstate_pct_busy;
u64 duration_us;
u64 idletime_us;
u64 aperf; u64 aperf;
u64 mperf; u64 mperf;
int freq; int freq;
...@@ -91,8 +86,6 @@ struct cpudata { ...@@ -91,8 +86,6 @@ struct cpudata {
int min_pstate_count; int min_pstate_count;
int idle_mode; int idle_mode;
ktime_t prev_sample;
u64 prev_idle_time_us;
u64 prev_aperf; u64 prev_aperf;
u64 prev_mperf; u64 prev_mperf;
int sample_ptr; int sample_ptr;
...@@ -450,48 +443,26 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata *cpu, ...@@ -450,48 +443,26 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata *cpu,
struct sample *sample) struct sample *sample)
{ {
u64 core_pct; u64 core_pct;
sample->pstate_pct_busy = 100 - div64_u64(
sample->idletime_us * 100,
sample->duration_us);
core_pct = div64_u64(sample->aperf * 100, sample->mperf); core_pct = div64_u64(sample->aperf * 100, sample->mperf);
sample->freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * core_pct * 1000; sample->freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * core_pct * 1000;
sample->core_pct_busy = div_s64((sample->pstate_pct_busy * core_pct), sample->core_pct_busy = core_pct;
100);
} }
static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu) static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu)
{ {
ktime_t now;
u64 idle_time_us;
u64 aperf, mperf; u64 aperf, mperf;
now = ktime_get();
idle_time_us = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu->cpu, NULL);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
/* for the first sample, don't actually record a sample, just cpu->sample_ptr = (cpu->sample_ptr + 1) % SAMPLE_COUNT;
* set the baseline */ cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf = aperf;
if (cpu->prev_idle_time_us > 0) { cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf = mperf;
cpu->sample_ptr = (cpu->sample_ptr + 1) % SAMPLE_COUNT; cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf -= cpu->prev_aperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].start_time = cpu->prev_sample; cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf -= cpu->prev_mperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].end_time = now;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].duration_us = intel_pstate_calc_busy(cpu, &cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr]);
ktime_us_delta(now, cpu->prev_sample);
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].idletime_us =
idle_time_us - cpu->prev_idle_time_us;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf = aperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf = mperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf -= cpu->prev_aperf;
cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf -= cpu->prev_mperf;
intel_pstate_calc_busy(cpu, &cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr]);
}
cpu->prev_sample = now;
cpu->prev_idle_time_us = idle_time_us;
cpu->prev_aperf = aperf; cpu->prev_aperf = aperf;
cpu->prev_mperf = mperf; cpu->prev_mperf = mperf;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment