Commit 1b82feb6 authored by Alexander Sverdlin's avatar Alexander Sverdlin Committed by Herbert Xu

crypto: qat - Silence smp_processor_id() warning

It seems that smp_processor_id() is only used for a best-effort
load-balancing, refer to qat_crypto_get_instance_node(). It's not feasible
to disable preemption for the duration of the crypto requests. Therefore,
just silence the warning. This commit is similar to e7a9b05c
("crypto: cavium - Fix smp_processor_id() warnings").

Silences the following splat:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: cryptomgr_test/2904
caller is qat_alg_ablkcipher_setkey+0x300/0x4a0 [intel_qat]
CPU: 1 PID: 2904 Comm: cryptomgr_test Tainted: P           O    4.14.69 #1
...
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x5f/0x86
 check_preemption_disabled+0xd3/0xe0
 qat_alg_ablkcipher_setkey+0x300/0x4a0 [intel_qat]
 skcipher_setkey_ablkcipher+0x2b/0x40
 __test_skcipher+0x1f3/0xb20
 ? cpumask_next_and+0x26/0x40
 ? find_busiest_group+0x10e/0x9d0
 ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
 ? try_module_get+0x61/0xf0
 ? crypto_mod_get+0x15/0x30
 ? __kmalloc+0x1df/0x1f0
 ? __crypto_alloc_tfm+0x116/0x180
 ? crypto_skcipher_init_tfm+0xa6/0x180
 ? crypto_create_tfm+0x4b/0xf0
 test_skcipher+0x21/0xa0
 alg_test_skcipher+0x3f/0xa0
 alg_test.part.6+0x126/0x2a0
 ? finish_task_switch+0x21b/0x260
 ? __schedule+0x1e9/0x800
 ? __wake_up_common+0x8d/0x140
 cryptomgr_test+0x40/0x50
 kthread+0xff/0x130
 ? cryptomgr_notify+0x540/0x540
 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50

Fixes: ed8ccaef ("crypto: qat - Add support for SRIOV")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
parent 01970282
......@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct service_hndl {
static inline int get_current_node(void)
{
return topology_physical_package_id(smp_processor_id());
return topology_physical_package_id(raw_smp_processor_id());
}
int adf_service_register(struct service_hndl *service);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment