Commit 22ae19c6 authored by Dmitry Torokhov's avatar Dmitry Torokhov

Input: uinput - fix race that can block nonblocking read

Consider two threads calling read() on the same uinput-fd, both
non-blocking. Assume there is data-available so both will simultaneously
pass:
	udev->head == udev->tail

Then the first thread goes to sleep and the second one pops the message
from the queue. Now assume udev->head == udev->tail. If the first thread
wakes up it will call wait_event_*() and sleep in the waitq. This
effectively turns the non-blocking FD into a blocking one.

We fix this by attempting to fetch events from the queue first and only
if we fail to retrieve any events we either return -EAGAIN (in case of
non-blocing read) or wait until there are more events.

This also fixes incorrect return code (we were returning 0 instead of
 -EAGAIN for non-blocking reads) when an event is "stolen" by another
thread. Blocking reads will now continue to wait instead of returning 0
in this scenario.

Count of 0 continues to be a special case, as per spec: we will check for
device existence and whether there are events in the queue, but no events
will be actually retrieved.
Reported-by: default avatarDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
parent f40033ac
...@@ -439,6 +439,9 @@ static ssize_t uinput_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, size_t ...@@ -439,6 +439,9 @@ static ssize_t uinput_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, size_t
struct uinput_device *udev = file->private_data; struct uinput_device *udev = file->private_data;
int retval; int retval;
if (count == 0)
return 0;
retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&udev->mutex); retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&udev->mutex);
if (retval) if (retval)
return retval; return retval;
...@@ -470,48 +473,59 @@ static bool uinput_fetch_next_event(struct uinput_device *udev, ...@@ -470,48 +473,59 @@ static bool uinput_fetch_next_event(struct uinput_device *udev,
return have_event; return have_event;
} }
static ssize_t uinput_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) static ssize_t uinput_events_to_user(struct uinput_device *udev,
char __user *buffer, size_t count)
{ {
struct uinput_device *udev = file->private_data;
struct input_event event; struct input_event event;
int retval = 0; size_t read = 0;
int error = 0;
if (count != 0 && count < input_event_size()) while (read + input_event_size() <= count &&
return -EINVAL; uinput_fetch_next_event(udev, &event)) {
if (udev->state != UIST_CREATED) if (input_event_to_user(buffer + read, &event)) {
return -ENODEV; error = -EFAULT;
break;
}
if (udev->head == udev->tail && (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)) read += input_event_size();
return -EAGAIN; }
retval = wait_event_interruptible(udev->waitq, return read ?: error;
udev->head != udev->tail || udev->state != UIST_CREATED); }
if (retval)
return retval;
retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&udev->mutex); static ssize_t uinput_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
if (retval) size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
return retval; {
struct uinput_device *udev = file->private_data;
ssize_t retval;
if (udev->state != UIST_CREATED) { if (count != 0 && count < input_event_size())
retval = -ENODEV; return -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
while (retval + input_event_size() <= count && do {
uinput_fetch_next_event(udev, &event)) { retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&udev->mutex);
if (retval)
return retval;
if (input_event_to_user(buffer + retval, &event)) { if (udev->state != UIST_CREATED)
retval = -EFAULT; retval = -ENODEV;
goto out; else if (udev->head == udev->tail &&
} (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
retval = -EAGAIN;
else
retval = uinput_events_to_user(udev, buffer, count);
retval += input_event_size(); mutex_unlock(&udev->mutex);
}
out: if (retval || count == 0)
mutex_unlock(&udev->mutex); break;
if (!(file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
retval = wait_event_interruptible(udev->waitq,
udev->head != udev->tail ||
udev->state != UIST_CREATED);
} while (retval == 0);
return retval; return retval;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment