x86/cpufeature: Fix various quality problems in the <asm/cpu_device_hd.h> header
Thomas noticed that the new arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h header is a train-wreck that didn't incorporate review feedback like not using __u8 in kernel-only headers. While at it also fix all the *other* problems this header has: - Use canonical names for the header guards. It's inexplicable why a non-standard guard was used. - Don't define the header guard to 1. Plus annotate the closing #endif as done absolutely every other header. Again, an inexplicable source of noise. - Move the kernel API calls provided by this header next to each other, there's absolutely no reason to have them spread apart in the header. - Align the INTEL_CPU_DESC() macro initializations vertically, this is easier to read and it's also the canonical style. - Actually name the macro arguments properly: instead of 'mod, step, rev', spell out 'model, stepping, revision' - it's not like we have a lack of characters in this header. - Actually make arguments macro-safe - again it's inexplicable why it wasn't done properly to begin with. Quite amazing how many problems a 41 lines header can contain. This kind of code quality is unacceptable, and it slipped through the review net of 2 developers and 2 maintainers, including myself, until Thomas noticed it. :-/ Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment