Commit 29b75eb2 authored by Jianyu Zhan's avatar Jianyu Zhan Committed by Thomas Gleixner

futex: Replace barrier() in unqueue_me() with READ_ONCE()

Commit e91467ec ("bug in futex unqueue_me") introduced a barrier() in
unqueue_me() to prevent the compiler from rereading the lock pointer which
might change after a check for NULL.

Replace the barrier() with a READ_ONCE() for the following reasons:

1) READ_ONCE() is a weaker form of barrier() that affects only the specific
   load operation, while barrier() is a general compiler level memory barrier.
   READ_ONCE() was not available at the time when the barrier was added.

2) Aside of that READ_ONCE() is descriptive and self explainatory while a
   barrier without comment is not clear to the casual reader.

No functional change.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarJianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457314344-5685-1-git-send-email-nasa4836@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent 9e4e7554
......@@ -2010,8 +2010,12 @@ static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
/* In the common case we don't take the spinlock, which is nice. */
retry:
lock_ptr = q->lock_ptr;
barrier();
/*
* q->lock_ptr can change between this read and the following spin_lock.
* Use READ_ONCE to forbid the compiler from reloading q->lock_ptr and
* optimizing lock_ptr out of the logic below.
*/
lock_ptr = READ_ONCE(q->lock_ptr);
if (lock_ptr != NULL) {
spin_lock(lock_ptr);
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment