Commit 2d1e38f5 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

kprobes: Cure hotplug lock ordering issues

Converting the cpu hotplug locking to a percpu rwsem unearthed hidden lock
ordering problems.

There is a wide range of locks involved in this: kprobe_mutex,
jump_label_mutex, ftrace_lock, text_mutex, event_mutex, module_mutex,
func_hash->regex_lock and a gazillion of lock order permutations with
nested get_online_cpus() calls.

Some of those permutations are potential deadlocks even with the current
nesting hotplug locking scheme, but they can't be discovered by lockdep.

The conversion of the hotplug locking to a percpu rwsem requires to prevent
nested locking, so it's required to take the hotplug rwsem early in the
call chain and establish a proper lock order.

After quite some analysis and going down the wrong road severa times the
following lock order has been chosen:

kprobe_mutex -> cpus_rwsem -> jump_label_mutex -> text_mutex

For kprobes which hook on an ftrace function trace point, it's required to
drop cpus_rwsem before calling into the ftrace code to avoid a deadlock on
the func_hash->regex_lock.

[ Steven: Ftrace interaction fixes ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170524081549.104864779@linutronix.de
parent f2545b2d
......@@ -483,11 +483,6 @@ static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(optimizing_work, kprobe_optimizer);
*/
static void do_optimize_kprobes(void)
{
/* Optimization never be done when disarmed */
if (kprobes_all_disarmed || !kprobes_allow_optimization ||
list_empty(&optimizing_list))
return;
/*
* The optimization/unoptimization refers online_cpus via
* stop_machine() and cpu-hotplug modifies online_cpus.
......@@ -495,14 +490,19 @@ static void do_optimize_kprobes(void)
* This combination can cause a deadlock (cpu-hotplug try to lock
* text_mutex but stop_machine can not be done because online_cpus
* has been changed)
* To avoid this deadlock, we need to call get_online_cpus()
* To avoid this deadlock, caller must have locked cpu hotplug
* for preventing cpu-hotplug outside of text_mutex locking.
*/
get_online_cpus();
lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
/* Optimization never be done when disarmed */
if (kprobes_all_disarmed || !kprobes_allow_optimization ||
list_empty(&optimizing_list))
return;
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
arch_optimize_kprobes(&optimizing_list);
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
}
/*
......@@ -513,12 +513,13 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void)
{
struct optimized_kprobe *op, *tmp;
/* See comment in do_optimize_kprobes() */
lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
/* Unoptimization must be done anytime */
if (list_empty(&unoptimizing_list))
return;
/* Ditto to do_optimize_kprobes */
get_online_cpus();
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
arch_unoptimize_kprobes(&unoptimizing_list, &freeing_list);
/* Loop free_list for disarming */
......@@ -537,7 +538,6 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void)
list_del_init(&op->list);
}
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
}
/* Reclaim all kprobes on the free_list */
......@@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ static void kick_kprobe_optimizer(void)
static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
{
mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
cpus_read_lock();
/* Lock modules while optimizing kprobes */
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
......@@ -587,6 +588,7 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
do_free_cleaned_kprobes();
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
cpus_read_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
/* Step 5: Kick optimizer again if needed */
......@@ -650,9 +652,8 @@ static void optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
/* Short cut to direct unoptimizing */
static void force_unoptimize_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
{
get_online_cpus();
lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
arch_unoptimize_kprobe(op);
put_online_cpus();
if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp))
arch_disarm_kprobe(&op->kp);
}
......@@ -791,6 +792,7 @@ static void try_to_optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
return;
/* For preparing optimization, jump_label_text_reserved() is called */
cpus_read_lock();
jump_label_lock();
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
......@@ -812,6 +814,7 @@ static void try_to_optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
out:
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
jump_label_unlock();
cpus_read_unlock();
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
......@@ -826,6 +829,7 @@ static void optimize_all_kprobes(void)
if (kprobes_allow_optimization)
goto out;
cpus_read_lock();
kprobes_allow_optimization = true;
for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
head = &kprobe_table[i];
......@@ -833,6 +837,7 @@ static void optimize_all_kprobes(void)
if (!kprobe_disabled(p))
optimize_kprobe(p);
}
cpus_read_unlock();
printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally optimized\n");
out:
mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
......@@ -851,6 +856,7 @@ static void unoptimize_all_kprobes(void)
return;
}
cpus_read_lock();
kprobes_allow_optimization = false;
for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
head = &kprobe_table[i];
......@@ -859,6 +865,7 @@ static void unoptimize_all_kprobes(void)
unoptimize_kprobe(p, false);
}
}
cpus_read_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
/* Wait for unoptimizing completion */
......@@ -1010,14 +1017,11 @@ static void arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
arm_kprobe_ftrace(kp);
return;
}
/*
* Here, since __arm_kprobe() doesn't use stop_machine(),
* this doesn't cause deadlock on text_mutex. So, we don't
* need get_online_cpus().
*/
cpus_read_lock();
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
__arm_kprobe(kp);
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
cpus_read_unlock();
}
/* Disarm a kprobe with text_mutex */
......@@ -1027,10 +1031,12 @@ static void disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp, bool reopt)
disarm_kprobe_ftrace(kp);
return;
}
/* Ditto */
cpus_read_lock();
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
__disarm_kprobe(kp, reopt);
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
cpus_read_unlock();
}
/*
......@@ -1298,13 +1304,10 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
int ret = 0;
struct kprobe *ap = orig_p;
cpus_read_lock();
/* For preparing optimization, jump_label_text_reserved() is called */
jump_label_lock();
/*
* Get online CPUs to avoid text_mutex deadlock.with stop machine,
* which is invoked by unoptimize_kprobe() in add_new_kprobe()
*/
get_online_cpus();
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
if (!kprobe_aggrprobe(orig_p)) {
......@@ -1352,8 +1355,8 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
out:
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
jump_label_unlock();
cpus_read_unlock();
if (ret == 0 && kprobe_disabled(ap) && !kprobe_disabled(p)) {
ap->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
......@@ -1555,9 +1558,12 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
goto out;
}
mutex_lock(&text_mutex); /* Avoiding text modification */
cpus_read_lock();
/* Prevent text modification */
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
ret = prepare_kprobe(p);
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
cpus_read_unlock();
if (ret)
goto out;
......@@ -1570,7 +1576,6 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
/* Try to optimize kprobe */
try_to_optimize_kprobe(p);
out:
mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment