Commit 349bdb68 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915/execlists: Reduce lock contention between schedule/submit_request

If we do not require to perform priority bumping, and we haven't yet
submitted the request, we can update its priority in situ and skip
acquiring the engine locks -- thus avoiding any contention between us
and submit/execute.

v2: Remove the stack element from the list if we can do the early
assignment.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent c5cf9a91
......@@ -779,6 +779,19 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link);
}
/* If we didn't need to bump any existing priorities, and we haven't
* yet submitted this request (i.e. there is no potential race with
* execlists_submit_request()), we can set our own priority and skip
* acquiring the engine locks.
*/
if (request->priotree.priority == INT_MIN) {
GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&request->priotree.link));
request->priotree.priority = prio;
if (stack.dfs_link.next == stack.dfs_link.prev)
return;
__list_del_entry(&stack.dfs_link);
}
engine = request->engine;
spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment