Commit 34aacb29 authored by Frederic Weisbecker's avatar Frederic Weisbecker

procfs: Use generic_file_llseek in /proc/kcore

/proc/kcore has no llseek and then falls down to use default_llseek.
This is racy against read_kcore() that directly manipulates fpos
but it doesn't hold the bkl there so using it in llseek doesn't
protect anything.

Let's use generic_file_llseek() instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
parent 87df8424
......@@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ static int open_kcore(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
static const struct file_operations proc_kcore_operations = {
.read = read_kcore,
.open = open_kcore,
.llseek = generic_file_llseek,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment