Commit 3ad98002 authored by Bart Van Assche's avatar Bart Van Assche Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: target/core: Reduce the amount of code executed with a spinlock held

Due to the "make ABORT and LUN RESET handling synchronous" patch, cmd->work
is only modified from the regular command execution path and no longer
asynchronously by the code that executes task management functions. Since
the regular command execution code is sequential per command, no locking is
required to manipulate cmd->work. Hence stop protecting cmd->work
manipulations with locking.

Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent 2c9fa49e
......@@ -853,16 +853,12 @@ void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status)
break;
}
if (!success) {
INIT_WORK(&cmd->work, target_complete_failure_work);
} else {
INIT_WORK(&cmd->work, target_complete_ok_work);
}
cmd->t_state = TRANSPORT_COMPLETE;
cmd->transport_state |= (CMD_T_COMPLETE | CMD_T_ACTIVE);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmd->t_state_lock, flags);
INIT_WORK(&cmd->work, success ? target_complete_ok_work :
target_complete_failure_work);
if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_USE_CPUID)
queue_work_on(cmd->cpuid, target_completion_wq, &cmd->work);
else
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment