mm: numa: handle side-effects in count_vm_numa_events() for !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
The current definitions for count_vm_numa_events() is wrong for !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING as the following would miss the side-effect. count_vm_numa_events(NUMA_FOO, bar++); There are no such users of count_vm_numa_events() but this patch fixes it as it is a potential pitfall. Ideally both would be converted to static inline but NUMA_PTE_UPDATES is not defined if !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING and creating dummy constants just to have a static inline would be similarly clumsy. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment