Commit 3d9f773c authored by David Miller's avatar David Miller Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() at simple call sites.

All of these cases are strictly of the form:

	preempt_disable();
	BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
	preempt_enable();

Replace this with bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() which wraps BPF_PROG_RUN()
with:

	migrate_disable();
	BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
	migrate_enable();

On non RT enabled kernels this maps to preempt_disable/enable() and on RT
enabled kernels this solely prevents migration, which is sufficient as
there is no requirement to prevent reentrancy to any BPF program from a
preempting task. The only requirement is that the program stays on the same
CPU.

Therefore, this is a trivially correct transformation.

The seccomp loop does not need protection over the loop. It only needs
protection per BPF filter program

[ tglx: Converted to bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200224145643.691493094@linutronix.de
parent 37e1d920
......@@ -717,9 +717,7 @@ static inline u32 bpf_prog_run_clear_cb(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
if (unlikely(prog->cb_access))
memset(cb_data, 0, BPF_SKB_CB_LEN);
preempt_disable();
res = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb);
preempt_enable();
res = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
return res;
}
......
......@@ -268,16 +268,14 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
* All filters in the list are evaluated and the lowest BPF return
* value always takes priority (ignoring the DATA).
*/
preempt_disable();
for (; f; f = f->prev) {
u32 cur_ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(f->prog, sd);
u32 cur_ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(f->prog, sd);
if (ACTION_ONLY(cur_ret) < ACTION_ONLY(ret)) {
ret = cur_ret;
*match = f;
}
}
preempt_enable();
return ret;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
......
......@@ -920,9 +920,7 @@ bool bpf_flow_dissect(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_flow_dissector *ctx,
(int)FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_STOP_AT_ENCAP);
flow_keys->flags = flags;
preempt_disable();
result = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
preempt_enable();
result = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, ctx);
flow_keys->nhoff = clamp_t(u16, flow_keys->nhoff, nhoff, hlen);
flow_keys->thoff = clamp_t(u16, flow_keys->thoff,
......
......@@ -628,7 +628,6 @@ int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
struct bpf_prog *prog;
int ret;
preempt_disable();
rcu_read_lock();
prog = READ_ONCE(psock->progs.msg_parser);
if (unlikely(!prog)) {
......@@ -638,7 +637,7 @@ int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
sk_msg_compute_data_pointers(msg);
msg->sk = sk;
ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, msg);
ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, msg);
ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, msg->sk_redir);
psock->apply_bytes = msg->apply_bytes;
if (ret == __SK_REDIRECT) {
......@@ -653,7 +652,6 @@ int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
}
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
preempt_enable();
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_psock_msg_verdict);
......@@ -665,9 +663,7 @@ static int sk_psock_bpf_run(struct sk_psock *psock, struct bpf_prog *prog,
skb->sk = psock->sk;
bpf_compute_data_end_sk_skb(skb);
preempt_disable();
ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb);
preempt_enable();
ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
/* strparser clones the skb before handing it to a upper layer,
* meaning skb_orphan has been called. We NULL sk on the way out
* to ensure we don't trigger a BUG_ON() in skb/sk operations
......
......@@ -380,9 +380,7 @@ static int kcm_parse_func_strparser(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct bpf_prog *prog = psock->bpf_prog;
int res;
preempt_disable();
res = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb);
preempt_enable();
res = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
return res;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment