Commit 411cb386 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo Committed by Jeff Garzik

libata: make WARN_ON conditions in ata_sff_hsm_move() more strict

WARN_ON()'s in ata_hsm_move() was too liberal and got triggerred when
it shouldn't (e.g. hotplug events at the right moment).  As the HSM
only deals with device errors and state machine violations, make it
check only against them.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
parent 458622fc
......@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ int ata_sff_hsm_move(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_queued_cmd *qc,
DPRINTK("ata%u: dev %u command complete, drv_stat 0x%x\n",
ap->print_id, qc->dev->devno, status);
WARN_ON(qc->err_mask);
WARN_ON(qc->err_mask & (AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_HSM));
ap->hsm_task_state = HSM_ST_IDLE;
......@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ int ata_sff_hsm_move(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_queued_cmd *qc,
/* make sure qc->err_mask is available to
* know what's wrong and recover
*/
WARN_ON(qc->err_mask == 0);
WARN_ON(!(qc->err_mask & (AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_HSM)));
ap->hsm_task_state = HSM_ST_IDLE;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment