Commit 44515374 authored by Bjorn Helgaas's avatar Bjorn Helgaas Committed by Len Brown

ACPI: call acpi_power_init() explicitly rather than as initcall

This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_power_init() directly.
Previously, both were subsys_initcalls.  acpi_power_init()
must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it
explicitly rather than rely on link ordering.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
CC: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
parent a5f820fe
......@@ -881,6 +881,7 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
acpi_scan_init();
acpi_ec_init();
acpi_power_init();
return result;
}
......
......@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ int acpi_scan_init(void);
/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Resource
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
int acpi_power_init(void);
int acpi_device_sleep_wake(struct acpi_device *dev,
int enable, int sleep_state, int dev_state);
int acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev, int sleep_state);
......
......@@ -773,14 +773,10 @@ static int acpi_power_resume(struct acpi_device *device)
return 0;
}
static int __init acpi_power_init(void)
int __init acpi_power_init(void)
{
int result = 0;
if (acpi_disabled)
return 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&acpi_power_resource_list);
acpi_power_dir = proc_mkdir(ACPI_POWER_CLASS, acpi_root_dir);
......@@ -795,5 +791,3 @@ static int __init acpi_power_init(void)
return 0;
}
subsys_initcall(acpi_power_init);
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment