Commit 47cee541 authored by Pavel Emelyanov's avatar Pavel Emelyanov Committed by J. Bruce Fields

nfsd: safer initialization order in find_file()

The alloc_init_file() first adds a file to the hash and then
initializes its fi_inode, fi_id and fi_had_conflict.

The uninitialized fi_inode could thus be erroneously checked by
the find_file(), so move the hash insertion lower.

The client_mutex should prevent this race in practice; however, we
eventually hope to make less use of the client_mutex, so the ordering
here is an accident waiting to happen.

I didn't find whether the same can be true for two other fields,
but the common sense tells me it's better to initialize an object
before putting it into a global hash table :)
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
parent b7299f44
......@@ -1757,12 +1757,12 @@ alloc_init_file(struct inode *ino)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_hash);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_stateids);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_delegations);
spin_lock(&recall_lock);
list_add(&fp->fi_hash, &file_hashtbl[hashval]);
spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
fp->fi_inode = igrab(ino);
fp->fi_id = current_fileid++;
fp->fi_had_conflict = false;
spin_lock(&recall_lock);
list_add(&fp->fi_hash, &file_hashtbl[hashval]);
spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
return fp;
}
return NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment