Commit 4900727d authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915/pmu: Reconstruct active state on starting busy-stats

We have a hole in our busy-stat accounting if the pmu is enabled during
a long running batch, the pmu will not start accumulating busy-time
until the next context switch. This then fails tests that are only
sampling a single batch.

v2: Count each active port just once (context in/out events are only on
the first and last assignment to a port).
v3: Avoid hardcoding knowledge of 2 submission ports

Fixes: 30e17b78 ("drm/i915: Engine busy time tracking")
Testcase: igt/perf_pmu/busy-start
Testcase: igt/perf_pmu/busy-double-start
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180111073031.14614-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 2bbba4e9
......@@ -1951,8 +1951,22 @@ int intel_enable_engine_stats(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
if (engine->stats.enabled == ~0)
goto busy;
if (engine->stats.enabled++ == 0)
if (engine->stats.enabled++ == 0) {
struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = &engine->execlists;
const struct execlist_port *port = execlists->port;
unsigned int num_ports = execlists_num_ports(execlists);
engine->stats.enabled_at = ktime_get();
/* XXX submission method oblivious? */
while (num_ports-- && port_isset(port)) {
engine->stats.active++;
port++;
}
if (engine->stats.active)
engine->stats.start = engine->stats.enabled_at;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment