Commit 4ad51a75 authored by Johan Hedberg's avatar Johan Hedberg Committed by Marcel Holtmann

Bluetooth: Add clarifying comment for conn->auth_type

When responding to an IO capability request when we're the initiators of
the pairing we will not yet have the remote IO capability information.
Since the conn->auth_type variable is treated as an "absolute"
requirement instead of a hint of what's needed later in the user
confirmation request handler it's important that it doesn't have the
MITM bit set if there's any chance that the remote device doesn't have
the necessary IO capabilities.

This patch adds a clarifying comment so that conn->auth_type is left
untouched in this scenario.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
parent ba15a58b
...@@ -3537,7 +3537,11 @@ static void hci_io_capa_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) ...@@ -3537,7 +3537,11 @@ static void hci_io_capa_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
cp.authentication = conn->auth_type; cp.authentication = conn->auth_type;
/* Request MITM protection if our IO caps allow it /* Request MITM protection if our IO caps allow it
* except for the no-bonding case * except for the no-bonding case.
* conn->auth_type is not updated here since
* that might cause the user confirmation to be
* rejected in case the remote doesn't have the
* IO capabilities for MITM.
*/ */
if (conn->io_capability != HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT && if (conn->io_capability != HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT &&
cp.authentication != HCI_AT_NO_BONDING) cp.authentication != HCI_AT_NO_BONDING)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment