Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
L
linux
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
linux
Commits
4c81ba49
Commit
4c81ba49
authored
Mar 14, 2010
by
Len Brown
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
ACPI: plan to delete "acpi=ht" boot option
Signed-off-by:
Len Brown
<
len.brown@intel.com
>
parent
8144c880
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
10 additions
and
1 deletion
+10
-1
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+7
-0
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+3
-1
No files found.
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
View file @
4c81ba49
...
...
@@ -582,3 +582,10 @@ Why: The paravirt mmu host support is slower than non-paravirt mmu, both
Who: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
----------------------------
What: "acpi=ht" boot option
When: 2.6.35
Why: Useful in 2003, implementation is a hack.
Generally invoked by accident today.
Seen as doing more harm than good.
Who: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
View file @
4c81ba49
...
...
@@ -1559,8 +1559,10 @@ static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
}
/* Limit ACPI just to boot-time to enable HT */
else
if
(
strcmp
(
arg
,
"ht"
)
==
0
)
{
if
(
!
acpi_force
)
if
(
!
acpi_force
)
{
printk
(
KERN_WARNING
"acpi=ht will be removed in Linux-2.6.35
\n
"
);
disable_acpi
();
}
acpi_ht
=
1
;
}
/* acpi=rsdt use RSDT instead of XSDT */
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment