Commit 4e4f1fc2 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

tcp: properly increase rcv_ssthresh for ofo packets

TCP receive window handling is multi staged.

A socket has a memory budget, static or dynamic, in sk_rcvbuf.

Because we do not really know how this memory budget translates to
a TCP window (payload), TCP announces a small initial window
(about 20 MSS).

When a packet is received, we increase TCP rcv_win depending
on the payload/truesize ratio of this packet. Good citizen
packets give a hint that it's reasonable to have rcv_win = sk_rcvbuf/2

This heuristic takes place in tcp_grow_window()

Problem is : We currently call tcp_grow_window() only for in-order
packets.

This means that reorders or packet losses stop proper grow of
rcv_win, and senders are unable to benefit from fast recovery,
or proper reordering level detection.

Really, a packet being stored in OFO queue is not a bad citizen.
It should be part of the game as in-order packets.

In our traces, we very often see sender is limited by linux small
receive windows, even if linux hosts use autotuning (DRS) and should
allow rcv_win to grow to ~3MB.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 0042d0c8
......@@ -4139,6 +4139,7 @@ static void tcp_data_queue_ofo(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!tcp_try_coalesce(sk, skb1, skb, &fragstolen)) {
__skb_queue_after(&tp->out_of_order_queue, skb1, skb);
} else {
tcp_grow_window(sk, skb);
kfree_skb_partial(skb, fragstolen);
skb = NULL;
}
......@@ -4214,8 +4215,10 @@ static void tcp_data_queue_ofo(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (tcp_is_sack(tp))
tcp_sack_new_ofo_skb(sk, seq, end_seq);
end:
if (skb)
if (skb) {
tcp_grow_window(sk, skb);
skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
}
}
static int __must_check tcp_queue_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int hdrlen,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment