drm/i915: Don't try to use DDR DVFS on CHV when disabled in the BIOS

If one disables DDR DVFS in the BIOS, Punit will apparently ignores
all DDR DVFS request. Currently we assume that DDR DVFS is always
operational, which leads to errors in dmesg when the DDR DVFS requests
time out.

Fix the problem by gently prodding Punit during driver load to find out
whether it will respond to DDR DVFS requests. If the request times out,
we assume that DDR DVFS has been permanenly disabled in the BIOS and
no longer perster the Punit about it.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91629Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Tested-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

@@ -1928,6 +1928,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
 			struct skl_wm_values skl_hw;
 			struct vlv_wm_values vlv;
 		};
+
+		uint8_t max_level;
 	} wm;
 
 	struct i915_runtime_pm pm;

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

@@ -955,8 +955,6 @@ enum vlv_wm_level {
 	VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM2,
 	VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM5,
 	VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS,
-	CHV_WM_NUM_LEVELS,
-	VLV_WM_NUM_LEVELS = 1,
 };
 
 /* latency must be in 0.1us units. */
@@ -982,9 +980,13 @@ static void vlv_setup_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev)
 	/* all latencies in usec */
 	dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM2] = 3;
 
+	dev_priv->wm.max_level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM2;
+
 	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
 		dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM5] = 12;
 		dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS] = 33;
+
+		dev_priv->wm.max_level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1137,10 +1139,7 @@ static void vlv_compute_wm(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 	memset(wm_state, 0, sizeof(*wm_state));
 
 	wm_state->cxsr = crtc->pipe != PIPE_C && crtc->wm.cxsr_allowed;
-	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev))
-		wm_state->num_levels = CHV_WM_NUM_LEVELS;
-	else
-		wm_state->num_levels = VLV_WM_NUM_LEVELS;
+	wm_state->num_levels = to_i915(dev)->wm.max_level + 1;
 
 	wm_state->num_active_planes = 0;
 
@@ -1220,7 +1219,7 @@ static void vlv_compute_wm(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 	}
 
 	/* clear any (partially) filled invalid levels */
-	for (level = wm_state->num_levels; level < CHV_WM_NUM_LEVELS; level++) {
+	for (level = wm_state->num_levels; level < to_i915(dev)->wm.max_level + 1; level++) {
 		memset(&wm_state->wm[level], 0, sizeof(wm_state->wm[level]));
 		memset(&wm_state->sr[level], 0, sizeof(wm_state->sr[level]));
 	}
@@ -1324,10 +1323,7 @@ static void vlv_merge_wm(struct drm_device *dev,
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	int num_active_crtcs = 0;
 
-	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev))
-		wm->level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS;
-	else
-		wm->level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM2;
+	wm->level = to_i915(dev)->wm.max_level;
 	wm->cxsr = true;
 
 	for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
@@ -4083,9 +4079,29 @@ void vlv_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
 		if (val & DSP_MAXFIFO_PM5_ENABLE)
 			wm->level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM5;
 
+		/*
+		 * If DDR DVFS is disabled in the BIOS, Punit
+		 * will never ack the request. So if that happens
+		 * assume we don't have to enable/disable DDR DVFS
+		 * dynamically. To test that just set the REQ_ACK
+		 * bit to poke the Punit, but don't change the
+		 * HIGH/LOW bits so that we don't actually change
+		 * the current state.
+		 */
 		val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DDR_SETUP2);
-		if ((val & FORCE_DDR_HIGH_FREQ) == 0)
-			wm->level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS;
+		val |= FORCE_DDR_FREQ_REQ_ACK;
+		vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DDR_SETUP2, val);
+
+		if (wait_for((vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DDR_SETUP2) &
+			      FORCE_DDR_FREQ_REQ_ACK) == 0, 3)) {
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Punit not acking DDR DVFS request, "
+				      "assuming DDR DVFS is disabled\n");
+			dev_priv->wm.max_level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_PM5;
+		} else {
+			val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DDR_SETUP2);
+			if ((val & FORCE_DDR_HIGH_FREQ) == 0)
+				wm->level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS;
+		}
 
 		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 	}