[JFFS2] Quiet lockdep false positive.

Don't hold f->sem while calling into jffs2_do_create(). It makes lockdep
unhappy, and we don't really need it -- the _reason_ it's a false
positive is because nobody else can see this inode yet and so nobody
will be trying to lock it anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

fs/jffs2/dir.c

@@ -208,6 +208,13 @@ static int jffs2_create(struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
 	f = JFFS2_INODE_INFO(inode);
 	dir_f = JFFS2_INODE_INFO(dir_i);
 
+	/* jffs2_do_create() will want to lock it, _after_ reserving
+	   space and taking c-alloc_sem. If we keep it locked here,
+	   lockdep gets unhappy (although it's a false positive;
+	   nothing else will be looking at this inode yet so there's
+	   no chance of AB-BA deadlock involving its f->sem). */
+	mutex_unlock(&f->sem);
+
 	ret = jffs2_do_create(c, dir_f, f, ri,
 			      dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len);
 	if (ret)

fs/jffs2/write.c

@@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ int jffs2_do_create(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_inode_info *dir_f, str
 	ret = jffs2_reserve_space(c, sizeof(*ri), &alloclen, ALLOC_NORMAL,
 				JFFS2_SUMMARY_INODE_SIZE);
 	D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_do_create(): reserved 0x%x bytes\n", alloclen));
-	if (ret) {
-		mutex_unlock(&f->sem);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	}
+
+	mutex_lock(&f->sem);
 
 	ri->data_crc = cpu_to_je32(0);
 	ri->node_crc = cpu_to_je32(crc32(0, ri, sizeof(*ri)-8));