ftrace: Create separate t_func_next() to simplify the function / hash logic
I noticed that if I use dd to read the set_ftrace_filter file that the first
hash command is repeated.
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
# echo schedule > set_ftrace_filter
# echo do_IRQ >> set_ftrace_filter
# echo schedule:traceoff >> set_ftrace_filter
# echo do_IRQ:traceoff >> set_ftrace_filter
# cat set_ftrace_filter
schedule
do_IRQ
schedule:traceoff:unlimited
do_IRQ:traceoff:unlimited
# dd if=set_ftrace_filter bs=1
schedule
do_IRQ
schedule:traceoff:unlimited
schedule:traceoff:unlimited
do_IRQ:traceoff:unlimited
98+0 records in
98+0 records out
98 bytes copied, 0.00265011 s, 37.0 kB/s
This is due to the way t_start() calls t_next() as well as the seq_file
calls t_next() and the state is slightly different between the two. Namely,
t_start() will call t_next() with a local "pos" variable.
By separating out the function listing from t_next() into its own function,
we can have better control of outputting the functions and the hash of
triggers. This simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment