Commit 5f3fe620 authored by David Hildenbrand's avatar David Hildenbrand Committed by Christian Borntraeger

KVM: s390: we always have a SCA

Having no sca can never happen, even when something goes wrong when
switching to ESCA. Otherwise we would have a serious bug.
Let's remove this superfluous check.
Acked-by: default avatarDominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
parent 2c1bb2be
...@@ -1608,13 +1608,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm *kvm, ...@@ -1608,13 +1608,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm *kvm,
vcpu->arch.sie_block->itdba = (unsigned long) &sie_page->itdb; vcpu->arch.sie_block->itdba = (unsigned long) &sie_page->itdb;
vcpu->arch.sie_block->icpua = id; vcpu->arch.sie_block->icpua = id;
if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm)) { if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
if (!kvm->arch.sca) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
goto out_free_cpu;
}
sca_add_vcpu(vcpu, kvm, id); sca_add_vcpu(vcpu, kvm, id);
}
spin_lock_init(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock); spin_lock_init(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int = &kvm->arch.float_int; vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int = &kvm->arch.float_int;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment