Commit 5f852eb5 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

tcp: tso: remove tp->tso_deferred

TSO relies on ability to defer sending a small amount of packets.
Heuristic is to wait for future ACKS in hope to send more packets at once.
Current algorithm uses a per socket tso_deferred field as a pseudo timer.

This pseudo timer relies on future ACK, but there is no guarantee
we receive them in time.

Fix would be to use a real timer, but cost of such timer is probably too
expensive for typical cases.

This patch changes the logic to test the time of last transmit,
because we should not add bursts of more than 1ms for any given flow.

We've used this patch for about two years at Google, before FQ/pacing
as it would reduce a fair amount of bursts.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 6588af61
......@@ -236,7 +236,6 @@ struct tcp_sock {
u32 lost_out; /* Lost packets */
u32 sacked_out; /* SACK'd packets */
u32 fackets_out; /* FACK'd packets */
u32 tso_deferred;
/* from STCP, retrans queue hinting */
struct sk_buff* lost_skb_hint;
......
......@@ -1763,9 +1763,10 @@ static bool tcp_tso_should_defer(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Open)
goto send_now;
/* Defer for less than two clock ticks. */
if (tp->tso_deferred &&
(((u32)jiffies << 1) >> 1) - (tp->tso_deferred >> 1) > 1)
/* Avoid bursty behavior by allowing defer
* only if the last write was recent.
*/
if ((s32)(tcp_time_stamp - tp->lsndtime) > 0)
goto send_now;
in_flight = tcp_packets_in_flight(tp);
......@@ -1807,11 +1808,7 @@ static bool tcp_tso_should_defer(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
goto send_now;
}
/* Ok, it looks like it is advisable to defer.
* Do not rearm the timer if already set to not break TCP ACK clocking.
*/
if (!tp->tso_deferred)
tp->tso_deferred = 1 | (jiffies << 1);
/* Ok, it looks like it is advisable to defer. */
if (cong_win < send_win && cong_win < skb->len)
*is_cwnd_limited = true;
......@@ -1819,7 +1816,6 @@ static bool tcp_tso_should_defer(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
return true;
send_now:
tp->tso_deferred = 0;
return false;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment