Commit 60041bcd authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra

objtool: Make handle_insn_ops() unconditional

Now that every instruction has a list of stack_ops; we can trivially
distinquish those instructions that do not have stack_ops, their list
is empty.

This means we can now call handle_insn_ops() unconditionally.
Suggested-by: default avatarJulien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMiroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Acked-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200428191659.795115188@infradead.org
parent 7d989fca
......@@ -2259,6 +2259,9 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
return 0;
}
if (handle_insn_ops(insn, &state))
return 1;
switch (insn->type) {
case INSN_RETURN:
......@@ -2318,9 +2321,6 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
break;
case INSN_EXCEPTION_RETURN:
if (handle_insn_ops(insn, &state))
return 1;
/*
* This handles x86's sync_core() case, where we use an
* IRET to self. All 'normal' IRET instructions are in
......@@ -2340,8 +2340,6 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
return 0;
case INSN_STACK:
if (handle_insn_ops(insn, &state))
return 1;
break;
case INSN_STAC:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment