Commit 605d5b32 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Avoid the branch in computing intel_ring_space()

Exploit the power-of-two ring size to compute the space across the
wraparound using a mask rather than a if. Convert to unsigned integers
so the operation is well defined.

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99671Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170504130846.4807-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 266a240b
......@@ -39,12 +39,17 @@
*/
#define LEGACY_REQUEST_SIZE 200
static int __intel_ring_space(int head, int tail, int size)
static unsigned int __intel_ring_space(unsigned int head,
unsigned int tail,
unsigned int size)
{
int space = head - tail;
if (space <= 0)
space += size;
return space - I915_RING_FREE_SPACE;
/*
* "If the Ring Buffer Head Pointer and the Tail Pointer are on the
* same cacheline, the Head Pointer must not be greater than the Tail
* Pointer."
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(size));
return (head - tail - CACHELINE_BYTES) & (size - 1);
}
void intel_ring_update_space(struct intel_ring *ring)
......@@ -1670,12 +1675,9 @@ static int wait_for_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, int bytes)
GEM_BUG_ON(!req->reserved_space);
list_for_each_entry(target, &ring->request_list, ring_link) {
unsigned space;
/* Would completion of this request free enough space? */
space = __intel_ring_space(target->postfix, ring->emit,
ring->size);
if (space >= bytes)
if (bytes <= __intel_ring_space(target->postfix,
ring->emit, ring->size))
break;
}
......@@ -1744,11 +1746,11 @@ u32 *intel_ring_begin(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, int num_dwords)
}
GEM_BUG_ON(ring->emit > ring->size - bytes);
GEM_BUG_ON(ring->space < bytes);
cs = ring->vaddr + ring->emit;
GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(memset(cs, POISON_INUSE, bytes));
ring->emit += bytes;
ring->space -= bytes;
GEM_BUG_ON(ring->space < 0);
return cs;
}
......
......@@ -17,17 +17,6 @@
#define CACHELINE_BYTES 64
#define CACHELINE_DWORDS (CACHELINE_BYTES / sizeof(uint32_t))
/*
* Gen2 BSpec "1. Programming Environment" / 1.4.4.6 "Ring Buffer Use"
* Gen3 BSpec "vol1c Memory Interface Functions" / 2.3.4.5 "Ring Buffer Use"
* Gen4+ BSpec "vol1c Memory Interface and Command Stream" / 5.3.4.5 "Ring Buffer Use"
*
* "If the Ring Buffer Head Pointer and the Tail Pointer are on the same
* cacheline, the Head Pointer must not be greater than the Tail
* Pointer."
*/
#define I915_RING_FREE_SPACE 64
struct intel_hw_status_page {
struct i915_vma *vma;
u32 *page_addr;
......@@ -145,9 +134,9 @@ struct intel_ring {
u32 tail;
u32 emit;
int space;
int size;
int effective_size;
u32 space;
u32 size;
u32 effective_size;
};
struct i915_gem_context;
......@@ -548,6 +537,25 @@ assert_ring_tail_valid(const struct intel_ring *ring, unsigned int tail)
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(tail, 8));
GEM_BUG_ON(tail >= ring->size);
/*
* "Ring Buffer Use"
* Gen2 BSpec "1. Programming Environment" / 1.4.4.6
* Gen3 BSpec "1c Memory Interface Functions" / 2.3.4.5
* Gen4+ BSpec "1c Memory Interface and Command Stream" / 5.3.4.5
* "If the Ring Buffer Head Pointer and the Tail Pointer are on the
* same cacheline, the Head Pointer must not be greater than the Tail
* Pointer."
*
* We use ring->head as the last known location of the actual RING_HEAD,
* it may have advanced but in the worst case it is equally the same
* as ring->head and so we should never program RING_TAIL to advance
* into the same cacheline as ring->head.
*/
#define cacheline(a) round_down(a, CACHELINE_BYTES)
GEM_BUG_ON(cacheline(tail) == cacheline(ring->head) &&
tail < ring->head);
#undef cacheline
}
static inline unsigned int
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment