Commit 61a6df54 authored by David Hildenbrand's avatar David Hildenbrand Committed by Christian Borntraeger

KVM: s390: call exit_sie() directly on vcpu block/request

Thinking about it, I can't find a real use case where we want
to block a VCPU and not kick it out of SIE. (except if we want
to do the same in batch for multiple VCPUs - but that's a micro
optimization)

So let's simply perform the exit_sie() calls directly when setting
the other magic block bits in the SIE.

Otherwise e.g. kvm_s390_set_tod_low() still has other VCPUs running
after that call, working with a wrong epoch.

Fixes: 27406cd5 ("KVM: s390: provide functions for blocking all CPUs")
Acked-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
parent 06b36753
......@@ -1417,6 +1417,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
atomic_set_mask(PROG_BLOCK_SIE, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->prog20);
exit_sie(vcpu);
}
void kvm_s390_vcpu_unblock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
......@@ -1427,6 +1428,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_unblock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void kvm_s390_vcpu_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
atomic_set_mask(PROG_REQUEST, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->prog20);
exit_sie(vcpu);
}
static void kvm_s390_vcpu_request_handled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
......@@ -1450,7 +1452,6 @@ void kvm_s390_sync_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
kvm_make_request(req, vcpu);
kvm_s390_vcpu_request(vcpu);
exit_sie(vcpu);
}
static void kvm_gmap_notifier(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long address)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment