Commit 61bccf19 authored by Robert Richter's avatar Robert Richter

oprofile: Remove 'WQ on CPUx, prefer CPUy' warning

Under certain workloads we see the following warnings:

 WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
 WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU2
 WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU3

It warns the user that the wq to access a per-cpu buffers runs not on
the same cpu. This happens if the wq is rescheduled on a different cpu
than where the buffer is located. This was probably implemented to
detect performance issues. Not sure if there actually is one as the
buffers are copied to a single buffer anyway which should be the
actual bottleneck.

We wont change WQ implementation. Since a user can do nothing the
warning is pointless. Removing it.

Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
parent 81ff3478
...@@ -451,14 +451,9 @@ static void wq_sync_buffer(struct work_struct *work) ...@@ -451,14 +451,9 @@ static void wq_sync_buffer(struct work_struct *work)
{ {
struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b = struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b =
container_of(work, struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, work.work); container_of(work, struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, work.work);
if (b->cpu != smp_processor_id()) { if (b->cpu != smp_processor_id() && !cpu_online(b->cpu)) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "WQ on CPU%d, prefer CPU%d\n", cancel_delayed_work(&b->work);
smp_processor_id(), b->cpu); return;
if (!cpu_online(b->cpu)) {
cancel_delayed_work(&b->work);
return;
}
} }
sync_buffer(b->cpu); sync_buffer(b->cpu);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment