Commit 65bb559b authored by Krzysztof Kazimierczak's avatar Krzysztof Kazimierczak Committed by Jeff Kirsher

ice: Add a boundary check in ice_xsk_umem()

In ice_xsk_umem(), variable qid which is later used as an array index,
is not validated for a possible boundary exceedance. Because of that,
a calling function might receive an invalid address, which causes
general protection fault when dereferenced.

To address this, add a boundary check to see if qid is greater than the
size of a UMEM array. Also, don't let user change vsi->num_xsk_umems
just by trying to setup a second UMEM if its value is already set up
(i.e. UMEM region has already been allocated for this VSI).

While at it, make sure that ring->zca.free pointer is always zeroed out
if there is no UMEM on a specified ring.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKrzysztof Kazimierczak <krzysztof.kazimierczak@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarAndrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
parent 1f45ebe0
......@@ -465,12 +465,13 @@ static inline void ice_set_ring_xdp(struct ice_ring *ring)
static inline struct xdp_umem *ice_xsk_umem(struct ice_ring *ring)
{
struct xdp_umem **umems = ring->vsi->xsk_umems;
int qid = ring->q_index;
u16 qid = ring->q_index;
if (ice_ring_is_xdp(ring))
qid -= ring->vsi->num_xdp_txq;
if (!umems || !umems[qid] || !ice_is_xdp_ena_vsi(ring->vsi))
if (qid >= ring->vsi->num_xsk_umems || !umems || !umems[qid] ||
!ice_is_xdp_ena_vsi(ring->vsi))
return NULL;
return umems[qid];
......
......@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ int ice_setup_rx_ctx(struct ice_ring *ring)
dev_info(&vsi->back->pdev->dev, "Registered XDP mem model MEM_TYPE_ZERO_COPY on Rx ring %d\n",
ring->q_index);
} else {
ring->zca.free = NULL;
if (!xdp_rxq_info_is_reg(&ring->xdp_rxq))
xdp_rxq_info_reg(&ring->xdp_rxq,
ring->netdev,
......
......@@ -414,7 +414,8 @@ ice_xsk_umem_enable(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct xdp_umem *umem, u16 qid)
if (vsi->type != ICE_VSI_PF)
return -EINVAL;
vsi->num_xsk_umems = min_t(u16, vsi->num_rxq, vsi->num_txq);
if (!vsi->num_xsk_umems)
vsi->num_xsk_umems = min_t(u16, vsi->num_rxq, vsi->num_txq);
if (qid >= vsi->num_xsk_umems)
return -EINVAL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment