Commit 68958bd5 authored by Vlad Dogaru's avatar Vlad Dogaru Committed by Jonathan Cameron

iio: sx9500: fix bug in compensation code

The initial compensation was mistakingly toggling an extra bit in the
control register.  Fix this and make sure it's less likely to happen by
introducing an additional macro.
Reported-by: default avatarHartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVlad Dogaru <vlad.dogaru@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarHartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
parent 657c7ff5
......@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
#define SX9500_COMPSTAT_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
#define SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS 4
#define SX9500_CHAN_MASK GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS - 1, 0)
struct sx9500_data {
struct mutex mutex;
......@@ -802,8 +803,7 @@ static int sx9500_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
unsigned int val;
ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9500_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS, 0),
GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS, 0));
SX9500_CHAN_MASK, SX9500_CHAN_MASK);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
......@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static int sx9500_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
out:
regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9500_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS, 0), 0);
SX9500_CHAN_MASK, 0);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment