Btrfs: fix confusing worker helper info in stacktrace
We've seen the following backtrace stack in ftrace or dmesg log, kworker/u16:10-4244 [000] 241942.480955: function: btrfs_put_ordered_extent kworker/u16:10-4244 [000] 241942.480956: kernel_stack: <stack trace> => finish_ordered_fn (ffffffffa0384475) => btrfs_scrubparity_helper (ffffffffa03ca577) <-----"incorrect" => btrfs_freespace_write_helper (ffffffffa03ca98e) <-----"correct" => process_one_work (ffffffff81117b2f) => worker_thread (ffffffff81118c2a) => kthread (ffffffff81121de0) => ret_from_fork (ffffffff81d7087a) btrfs_freespace_write_helper is actually calling normal_worker_helper instead of btrfs_scrubparity_helper, so somehow kernel has parsed the incorrect function address while unwinding the stack, btrfs_scrubparity_helper really shouldn't be shown up. It's caused by compiler doing inline for our helper function, adding a noinline tag can fix that. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ use noinline_for_stack ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment