Commit 6b89d4c1 authored by Stephane Eranian's avatar Stephane Eranian Committed by Ingo Molnar

perf/x86/intel: Fix INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT* masking

On Intel Westmere, a cmdline as follows:

  $ perf record -e cpu/event=0xc4,umask=0x2,name=br_inst_retired.near_call/p ....

was failing. Yet the event+ umask support PEBS.

It turns out this is due to a bug in the the PEBS event constraint table for
westmere. All forms of BR_INST_RETIRED.* support PEBS. Therefore the constraint
mask should ignore the umask. The name of the macro INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT()
hint that this is the case but it was not. That macros was checking both the
event code and event umask. Therefore, it was only matching on 0x00c4.
There are code+umask macros, they all have *UEVENT*.

This bug fixes the issue by checking only the event code in the mask.
Both single and range version are modified.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: kan.liang@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190509214556.123493-1-eranian@google.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 4abf1ee1
......@@ -394,10 +394,10 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
/* Event constraint, but match on all event flags too. */
#define INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
#define INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n) \
EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
/* Check only flags, but allow all event/umask */
#define INTEL_ALL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(code, n) \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment