Commit 6ded34d1 authored by Kent Overstreet's avatar Kent Overstreet

bcache: Improve lazy sorting

The old lazy sorting code was kind of hacky - rewrite in a way that
mathematically makes more sense; the idea is that the size of the sets
of keys in a btree node should increase by a more or less fixed ratio
from smallest to biggest.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
parent 85b1492e
......@@ -828,6 +828,7 @@ struct cache_set {
*/
struct mutex sort_lock;
struct bset *sort;
unsigned sort_crit_factor;
/* List of buckets we're currently writing data to */
struct list_head data_buckets;
......
......@@ -1092,33 +1092,39 @@ void bch_btree_sort_into(struct btree *b, struct btree *new)
new->sets->size = 0;
}
#define SORT_CRIT (4096 / sizeof(uint64_t))
void bch_btree_sort_lazy(struct btree *b)
{
if (b->nsets) {
unsigned i, j, keys = 0, total;
for (i = 0; i <= b->nsets; i++)
keys += b->sets[i].data->keys;
unsigned crit = SORT_CRIT;
int i;
total = keys;
/* Don't sort if nothing to do */
if (!b->nsets)
goto out;
for (j = 0; j < b->nsets; j++) {
if (keys * 2 < total ||
keys < 1000) {
bch_btree_sort_partial(b, j);
return;
}
/* If not a leaf node, always sort */
if (b->level) {
bch_btree_sort(b);
return;
}
keys -= b->sets[j].data->keys;
}
for (i = b->nsets - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
crit *= b->c->sort_crit_factor;
/* Must sort if b->nsets == 3 or we'll overflow */
if (b->nsets >= (MAX_BSETS - 1) - b->level) {
bch_btree_sort(b);
if (b->sets[i].data->keys < crit) {
bch_btree_sort_partial(b, i);
return;
}
}
/* Sort if we'd overflow */
if (b->nsets + 1 == MAX_BSETS) {
bch_btree_sort(b);
return;
}
out:
bset_build_written_tree(b);
}
......
......@@ -1375,6 +1375,8 @@ struct cache_set *bch_cache_set_alloc(struct cache_sb *sb)
c->btree_pages = max_t(int, c->btree_pages / 4,
BTREE_MAX_PAGES);
c->sort_crit_factor = int_sqrt(c->btree_pages);
mutex_init(&c->bucket_lock);
mutex_init(&c->sort_lock);
spin_lock_init(&c->sort_time_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment