Commit 7005cade authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by David S. Miller

bpf, arm64: use separate register for state in stxr

Will reported that in BPF_XADD we must use a different register in stxr
instruction for the status flag due to otherwise CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE
behavior per architecture. Reference manual says [1]:

  If s == t, then one of the following behaviors must occur:

   * The instruction is UNDEFINED.
   * The instruction executes as a NOP.
   * The instruction performs the store to the specified address, but
     the value stored is UNKNOWN.

Thus, use a different temporary register for the status flag to fix it.

Disassembly extract from test 226/STX_XADD_DW from test_bpf.ko:

  [...]
  0000003c:  c85f7d4b  ldxr x11, [x10]
  00000040:  8b07016b  add x11, x11, x7
  00000044:  c80c7d4b  stxr w12, x11, [x10]
  00000048:  35ffffac  cbnz w12, 0x0000003c
  [...]

  [1] https://static.docs.arm.com/ddi0487/b/DDI0487B_a_armv8_arm.pdf, p.6132

Fixes: 85f68fe8 ("bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADD")
Reported-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent e173db36
......@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly;
#define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0)
#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
#define TCALL_CNT (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2)
#define TMP_REG_3 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3)
/* Map BPF registers to A64 registers */
static const int bpf2a64[] = {
......@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ static const int bpf2a64[] = {
/* temporary registers for internal BPF JIT */
[TMP_REG_1] = A64_R(10),
[TMP_REG_2] = A64_R(11),
[TMP_REG_3] = A64_R(12),
/* tail_call_cnt */
[TCALL_CNT] = A64_R(26),
/* temporary register for blinding constants */
......@@ -319,6 +321,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 src = bpf2a64[insn->src_reg];
const u8 tmp = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
const u8 tmp3 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_3];
const s16 off = insn->off;
const s32 imm = insn->imm;
const int i = insn - ctx->prog->insnsi;
......@@ -689,10 +692,10 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(A64_PRFM(tmp, PST, L1, STRM), ctx);
emit(A64_LDXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp), ctx);
emit(A64_ADD(isdw, tmp2, tmp2, src), ctx);
emit(A64_STXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp, tmp2), ctx);
emit(A64_STXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp, tmp3), ctx);
jmp_offset = -3;
check_imm19(jmp_offset);
emit(A64_CBNZ(0, tmp2, jmp_offset), ctx);
emit(A64_CBNZ(0, tmp3, jmp_offset), ctx);
break;
/* R0 = ntohx(*(size *)(((struct sk_buff *)R6)->data + imm)) */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment