net: sctp, forbid negative length
[ Upstream commit a4b8e71b ] Most of getsockopt handlers in net/sctp/socket.c check len against sizeof some structure like: if (len < sizeof(int)) return -EINVAL; On the first look, the check seems to be correct. But since len is int and sizeof returns size_t, int gets promoted to unsigned size_t too. So the test returns false for negative lengths. Yes, (-1 < sizeof(long)) is false. Fix this in sctp by explicitly checking len < 0 before any getsockopt handler is called. Note that sctp_getsockopt_events already handled the negative case. Since we added the < 0 check elsewhere, this one can be removed. If not checked, this is the result: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ../mm/page_alloc.c:2722:19 shift exponent 52 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' CPU: 1 PID: 24535 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.8.1-0-syzkaller #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 0000000000000000 ffff88006d99f2a8 ffffffffb2f7bdea 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffffb4363c14 ffffffffb2f7bcde ffff88006d99f2d0 ffff88006d99f270 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000034 ffffffffb5096422 Call Trace: [<ffffffffb3051498>] ? __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x29c/0x300 ... [<ffffffffb273f0e4>] ? kmalloc_order+0x24/0x90 [<ffffffffb27416a4>] ? kmalloc_order_trace+0x24/0x220 [<ffffffffb2819a30>] ? __kmalloc+0x330/0x540 [<ffffffffc18c25f4>] ? sctp_getsockopt_local_addrs+0x174/0xca0 [sctp] [<ffffffffc18d2bcd>] ? sctp_getsockopt+0x10d/0x1b0 [sctp] [<ffffffffb37c1219>] ? sock_common_getsockopt+0xb9/0x150 [<ffffffffb37be2f5>] ? SyS_getsockopt+0x1a5/0x270 Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment