Commit 77e569ed authored by Emmanuel Grumbach's avatar Emmanuel Grumbach Committed by Wey-Yi Guy

iwlagn: Fix a bug introduced by the HUGE command removal

Since we don't have HUGE command any more, there is no point in adding 1
to the num of slots in the command queue. Doing so is buggy and might corrupt
memory.

Bug introduced by 4ce7cc2b
iwlagn: support multiple TBs per command

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
parent 3373b28e
...@@ -535,12 +535,7 @@ int iwl_tx_queue_init(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_tx_queue *txq, ...@@ -535,12 +535,7 @@ int iwl_tx_queue_init(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_tx_queue *txq,
void iwl_tx_queue_reset(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_tx_queue *txq, void iwl_tx_queue_reset(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_tx_queue *txq,
int slots_num, u32 txq_id) int slots_num, u32 txq_id)
{ {
int actual_slots = slots_num; memset(txq->meta, 0, sizeof(struct iwl_cmd_meta) * slots_num);
if (txq_id == priv->cmd_queue)
actual_slots++;
memset(txq->meta, 0, sizeof(struct iwl_cmd_meta) * actual_slots);
txq->need_update = 0; txq->need_update = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment