pinctrl: baytrail: Use raw_spinlock for locking
The Intel Baytrail pinctrl driver implements irqchip callbacks which are called with desc->lock raw_spinlock held. In mainline this is fine because spinlock resolves to raw_spinlock. However, running the same code in -rt we get: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 0, name: swapper/0 Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff81092e9f>] cpu_startup_entry+0x17f/0x480 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.1.5-rt5 #13 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff816283c6>] dump_stack+0x4a/0x61 [<ffffffff81077e17>] ___might_sleep+0xe7/0x170 [<ffffffff8162d6cf>] rt_spin_lock+0x1f/0x50 [<ffffffff812e3b88>] byt_gpio_clear_triggering+0x38/0x60 [<ffffffff812e3bc1>] byt_irq_mask+0x11/0x20 [<ffffffff810a7013>] handle_level_irq+0x83/0x150 [<ffffffff810a3457>] generic_handle_irq+0x27/0x40 [<ffffffff812e3a5f>] byt_gpio_irq_handler+0x7f/0xc0 [<ffffffff810050aa>] handle_irq+0xaa/0x190 ... This is because in -rt spinlocks are preemptible so taking the driver private spinlock in irqchip callbacks causes might_sleep() to trigger. In order to keep -rt happy but at the same time make sure that register accesses get serialized, convert the driver to use raw_spinlock instead. Also shorten the critical section a bit in few places. Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment