Commit 7a4ddcd9 authored by dingtianhong's avatar dingtianhong Committed by David S. Miller

bonding: remove no longer needed lock for bond_xxx_info_query()

The bond_xxx_info_query() was already in RTNL, so no need to use
bond lock to protect the bond slave list, so remove it.

Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4335d60e
......@@ -1816,9 +1816,7 @@ static int bond_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifbond *info)
info->bond_mode = bond->params.mode;
info->miimon = bond->params.miimon;
read_lock(&bond->lock);
info->num_slaves = bond->slave_cnt;
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
return 0;
}
......@@ -1830,7 +1828,6 @@ static int bond_slave_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifslave *in
int i = 0, res = -ENODEV;
struct slave *slave;
read_lock(&bond->lock);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
if (i++ == (int)info->slave_id) {
res = 0;
......@@ -1841,7 +1838,6 @@ static int bond_slave_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifslave *in
break;
}
}
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
return res;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment