Commit 8061252e authored by Joerg Roedel's avatar Joerg Roedel Committed by Avi Kivity

KVM: SVM: Add intercept checks for remaining twobyte instructions

This patch adds intercepts checks for the remaining twobyte
instructions to the KVM instruction emulator.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
parent d7eb8203
......@@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ enum x86_intercept {
x86_intercept_wbinvd,
x86_intercept_monitor,
x86_intercept_mwait,
x86_intercept_rdmsr,
x86_intercept_wrmsr,
nr_x86_intercepts
};
......
......@@ -2425,12 +2425,9 @@ static int em_cwd(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
static int em_rdtsc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
{
unsigned cpl = ctxt->ops->cpl(ctxt->vcpu);
struct decode_cache *c = &ctxt->decode;
u64 tsc = 0;
if (cpl > 0 && (ctxt->ops->get_cr(4, ctxt->vcpu) & X86_CR4_TSD))
return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt->vcpu, MSR_IA32_TSC, &tsc);
c->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = (u32)tsc;
c->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = tsc >> 32;
......@@ -2614,6 +2611,18 @@ static int check_rdtsc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
}
static int check_rdpmc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
{
u64 cr4 = ctxt->ops->get_cr(4, ctxt->vcpu);
u64 rcx = kvm_register_read(ctxt->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
if ((!(cr4 & X86_CR4_PCE) && ctxt->ops->cpl(ctxt->vcpu)) ||
(rcx > 3))
return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
}
#define D(_y) { .flags = (_y) }
#define DI(_y, _i) { .flags = (_y), .intercept = x86_intercept_##_i }
#define DIP(_y, _i, _p) { .flags = (_y), .intercept = x86_intercept_##_i, \
......@@ -2846,8 +2855,10 @@ static struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
N, N, N, N,
N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
/* 0x30 - 0x3F */
D(ImplicitOps | Priv), II(ImplicitOps, em_rdtsc, rdtsc),
D(ImplicitOps | Priv), N,
DI(ImplicitOps | Priv, wrmsr),
IIP(ImplicitOps, em_rdtsc, rdtsc, check_rdtsc),
DI(ImplicitOps | Priv, rdmsr),
DIP(ImplicitOps | Priv, rdpmc, check_rdpmc),
D(ImplicitOps | VendorSpecific), D(ImplicitOps | Priv | VendorSpecific),
N, N,
N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
......@@ -2871,12 +2882,12 @@ static struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
X16(D(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM| Mov)),
/* 0xA0 - 0xA7 */
D(ImplicitOps | Stack), D(ImplicitOps | Stack),
N, D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp),
DI(ImplicitOps, cpuid), D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp),
D(DstMem | SrcReg | Src2ImmByte | ModRM),
D(DstMem | SrcReg | Src2CL | ModRM), N, N,
/* 0xA8 - 0xAF */
D(ImplicitOps | Stack), D(ImplicitOps | Stack),
N, D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp | Lock),
DI(ImplicitOps, rsm), D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp | Lock),
D(DstMem | SrcReg | Src2ImmByte | ModRM),
D(DstMem | SrcReg | Src2CL | ModRM),
D(ModRM), I(DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM, em_imul),
......
......@@ -3868,6 +3868,9 @@ static void svm_fpu_deactivate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
update_cr0_intercept(svm);
}
#define PRE_EX(exit) { .exit_code = (exit), \
.stage = X86_ICPT_PRE_EXCEPT, \
.valid = true }
#define POST_EX(exit) { .exit_code = (exit), \
.stage = X86_ICPT_POST_EXCEPT, \
.valid = true }
......@@ -3906,8 +3909,18 @@ static struct __x86_intercept {
[x86_intercept_rdtscp] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_RDTSCP),
[x86_intercept_monitor] = POST_MEM(SVM_EXIT_MONITOR),
[x86_intercept_mwait] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_MWAIT),
[x86_intercept_invlpg] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_INVLPG),
[x86_intercept_invd] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_INVD),
[x86_intercept_wbinvd] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_WBINVD),
[x86_intercept_wrmsr] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_MSR),
[x86_intercept_rdtsc] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_RDTSC),
[x86_intercept_rdmsr] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_MSR),
[x86_intercept_rdpmc] = POST_EX(SVM_EXIT_RDPMC),
[x86_intercept_cpuid] = PRE_EX(SVM_EXIT_CPUID),
[x86_intercept_rsm] = PRE_EX(SVM_EXIT_RSM),
};
#undef PRE_EX
#undef POST_EX
#undef POST_MEM
......@@ -3968,6 +3981,12 @@ static int svm_check_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
case SVM_EXIT_WRITE_DR0:
icpt_info.exit_code += info->modrm_reg;
break;
case SVM_EXIT_MSR:
if (info->intercept == x86_intercept_wrmsr)
vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = 1;
else
vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = 0;
break;
default:
break;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment