Commit 83ce6ef8 authored by Tony Luck's avatar Tony Luck

[IA64] Don't set psr.ic and psr.i simultaneously

It's not a good idea to use "ssm psr.ic | psr.i" to simultaneously
enable interrupts and interrupt state collection, the two bits can
take effect asynchronously, so it is possible for an interrupt to
be serviced while psr.ic is still zero.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
parent 7dcca30a
......@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ GLOBAL_ENTRY(mca_handler_bhhook)
mov b6=loc1
;;
mov loc1=rp
ssm psr.i | psr.ic
ssm psr.ic
;;
srlz.i
;;
ssm psr.i
br.call.sptk.many rp=b6 // does not return ...
;;
mov ar.pfs=loc0
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment