Commit 8748b850 authored by Takashi Iwai's avatar Takashi Iwai

ALSA: timer: Unify timer callback process code

The timer core has two almost identical code for processing callbacks:
once in snd_timer_interrupt() for fast callbacks and another in
snd_timer_tasklet() for delayed callbacks.  Let's unify them.

In the new version, the resolution is read from ti->resolution at each
call, and this must be fine; ti->resolution is set in the preparation
step in snd_timer_interrupt().
Signed-off-by: default avatarTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
parent e42dd3ee
......@@ -720,29 +720,19 @@ static void snd_timer_reschedule(struct snd_timer * timer, unsigned long ticks_l
timer->sticks = ticks;
}
/*
* timer tasklet
*
*/
static void snd_timer_tasklet(unsigned long arg)
/* call callbacks in timer ack list */
static void snd_timer_process_callbacks(struct snd_timer *timer,
struct list_head *head)
{
struct snd_timer *timer = (struct snd_timer *) arg;
struct snd_timer_instance *ti;
struct list_head *p;
unsigned long resolution, ticks;
unsigned long flags;
if (timer->card && timer->card->shutdown)
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&timer->lock, flags);
/* now process all callbacks */
while (!list_empty(&timer->sack_list_head)) {
p = timer->sack_list_head.next; /* get first item */
ti = list_entry(p, struct snd_timer_instance, ack_list);
while (!list_empty(head)) {
ti = list_first_entry(head, struct snd_timer_instance,
ack_list);
/* remove from ack_list and make empty */
list_del_init(p);
list_del_init(&ti->ack_list);
ticks = ti->pticks;
ti->pticks = 0;
......@@ -755,6 +745,22 @@ static void snd_timer_tasklet(unsigned long arg)
spin_lock(&timer->lock);
ti->flags &= ~SNDRV_TIMER_IFLG_CALLBACK;
}
}
/*
* timer tasklet
*
*/
static void snd_timer_tasklet(unsigned long arg)
{
struct snd_timer *timer = (struct snd_timer *) arg;
unsigned long flags;
if (timer->card && timer->card->shutdown)
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&timer->lock, flags);
snd_timer_process_callbacks(timer, &timer->sack_list_head);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timer->lock, flags);
}
......@@ -767,8 +773,8 @@ static void snd_timer_tasklet(unsigned long arg)
void snd_timer_interrupt(struct snd_timer * timer, unsigned long ticks_left)
{
struct snd_timer_instance *ti, *ts, *tmp;
unsigned long resolution, ticks;
struct list_head *p, *ack_list_head;
unsigned long resolution;
struct list_head *ack_list_head;
unsigned long flags;
int use_tasklet = 0;
......@@ -839,23 +845,7 @@ void snd_timer_interrupt(struct snd_timer * timer, unsigned long ticks_left)
}
/* now process all fast callbacks */
while (!list_empty(&timer->ack_list_head)) {
p = timer->ack_list_head.next; /* get first item */
ti = list_entry(p, struct snd_timer_instance, ack_list);
/* remove from ack_list and make empty */
list_del_init(p);
ticks = ti->pticks;
ti->pticks = 0;
ti->flags |= SNDRV_TIMER_IFLG_CALLBACK;
spin_unlock(&timer->lock);
if (ti->callback)
ti->callback(ti, resolution, ticks);
spin_lock(&timer->lock);
ti->flags &= ~SNDRV_TIMER_IFLG_CALLBACK;
}
snd_timer_process_callbacks(timer, &timer->ack_list_head);
/* do we have any slow callbacks? */
use_tasklet = !list_empty(&timer->sack_list_head);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment