Commit 8a012b92 authored by Eric W. Biederman's avatar Eric W. Biederman Committed by Sasha Levin

mnt: In umount propagation reparent in a separate pass

[ Upstream commit 570487d3 ]

It was observed that in some pathlogical cases that the current code
does not unmount everything it should.  After investigation it
was determined that the issue is that mnt_change_mntpoint can
can change which mounts are available to be unmounted during mount
propagation which is wrong.

The trivial reproducer is:
$ cat ./pathological.sh

mount -t tmpfs test-base /mnt
cd /mnt
mkdir 1 2 1/1
mount --bind 1 1
mount --make-shared 1
mount --bind 1 2
mount --bind 1/1 1/1
mount --bind 1/1 1/1
echo
grep test-base /proc/self/mountinfo
umount 1/1
echo
grep test-base /proc/self/mountinfo

$ unshare -Urm ./pathological.sh

The expected output looks like:
46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
49 54 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
50 53 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
51 49 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
54 47 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
53 48 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
52 50 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000

46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000

The output without the fix looks like:
46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
49 54 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
50 53 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
51 49 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
54 47 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
53 48 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
52 50 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000

46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
52 48 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000

That last mount in the output was in the propgation tree to be unmounted but
was missed because the mnt_change_mountpoint changed it's parent before the walk
through the mount propagation tree observed it.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1064f874 ("mnt: Tuck mounts under others instead of creating shadow/side mounts.")
Acked-by: default avatarAndrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRam Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
parent e3400a3c
......@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct mount {
struct mnt_namespace *mnt_ns; /* containing namespace */
struct mountpoint *mnt_mp; /* where is it mounted */
struct hlist_node mnt_mp_list; /* list mounts with the same mountpoint */
struct list_head mnt_reparent; /* reparent list entry */
#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
struct hlist_head mnt_fsnotify_marks;
__u32 mnt_fsnotify_mask;
......
......@@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ static struct mount *alloc_vfsmnt(const char *name)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave);
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&mnt->mnt_mp_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_reparent);
#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_fsnotify_marks);
#endif
......
......@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static void mark_umount_candidates(struct mount *mnt)
* NOTE: unmounting 'mnt' naturally propagates to all other mounts its
* parent propagates to.
*/
static void __propagate_umount(struct mount *mnt)
static void __propagate_umount(struct mount *mnt, struct list_head *to_reparent)
{
struct mount *parent = mnt->mnt_parent;
struct mount *m;
......@@ -466,17 +466,38 @@ static void __propagate_umount(struct mount *mnt)
*/
topper = find_topper(child);
if (topper)
mnt_change_mountpoint(child->mnt_parent, child->mnt_mp,
topper);
list_add_tail(&topper->mnt_reparent, to_reparent);
if (list_empty(&child->mnt_mounts)) {
if (topper || list_empty(&child->mnt_mounts)) {
list_del_init(&child->mnt_child);
list_del_init(&child->mnt_reparent);
child->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_UMOUNT;
list_move_tail(&child->mnt_list, &mnt->mnt_list);
}
}
}
static void reparent_mounts(struct list_head *to_reparent)
{
while (!list_empty(to_reparent)) {
struct mount *mnt, *parent;
struct mountpoint *mp;
mnt = list_first_entry(to_reparent, struct mount, mnt_reparent);
list_del_init(&mnt->mnt_reparent);
/* Where should this mount be reparented to? */
mp = mnt->mnt_mp;
parent = mnt->mnt_parent;
while (parent->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_UMOUNT) {
mp = parent->mnt_mp;
parent = parent->mnt_parent;
}
mnt_change_mountpoint(parent, mp, mnt);
}
}
/*
* collect all mounts that receive propagation from the mount in @list,
* and return these additional mounts in the same list.
......@@ -487,11 +508,15 @@ static void __propagate_umount(struct mount *mnt)
int propagate_umount(struct list_head *list)
{
struct mount *mnt;
LIST_HEAD(to_reparent);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(mnt, list, mnt_list)
mark_umount_candidates(mnt);
list_for_each_entry(mnt, list, mnt_list)
__propagate_umount(mnt);
__propagate_umount(mnt, &to_reparent);
reparent_mounts(&to_reparent);
return 0;
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment