drm/i915/display: Add comment to a function that probably can be removed

This function is only called from port sync and it is identical to
what will be executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync
pipes.
If it is really necessary at least it deserves a better name and a
comment, leaving it to people working on port sync.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191223010654.67037-7-jose.souza@intel.com
parent 080d47bf
......@@ -14737,6 +14737,10 @@ static void intel_set_dp_tp_ctl_normal(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
}
/*
* TODO: This is only called from port sync and it is identical to what will be
* executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync pipes
*/
static void intel_post_crtc_enable_updates(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
struct intel_atomic_state *state)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment