Commit 8da1aecd authored by Heiko Carstens's avatar Heiko Carstens Committed by Martin Schwidefsky

[S390] Improve __smp_call_function_map.

There is no need to disable bottom halves when holding call_lock. Also
this could imply that it is legal to call smp_call_function* from
bh context, which it is not.
Also test if func will be executed locally before disabling
and aterwards enabling interrupts again. It's not necessary to disable
and enable interrupts each time __smp_call_function_map gets called.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent 3bb447fc
......@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static void __smp_call_function_map(void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
if (wait)
data.finished = CPU_MASK_NONE;
spin_lock_bh(&call_lock);
spin_lock(&call_lock);
call_data = &data;
for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, map)
......@@ -129,18 +129,16 @@ static void __smp_call_function_map(void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
/* Wait for response */
while (!cpus_equal(map, data.started))
cpu_relax();
if (wait)
while (!cpus_equal(map, data.finished))
cpu_relax();
spin_unlock_bh(&call_lock);
spin_unlock(&call_lock);
out:
local_irq_disable();
if (local)
if (local) {
local_irq_disable();
func(info);
local_irq_enable();
local_irq_enable();
}
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment