Commit 92072452 authored by Paul Mundt's avatar Paul Mundt

Merge branch 'common/intc-extension' into sh-latest

parents d1000edd b59f9f97
......@@ -2,13 +2,14 @@
* IRQ chip definitions for INTC IRQs.
*
* Copyright (C) 2007, 2008 Magnus Damm
* Copyright (C) 2009, 2010 Paul Mundt
* Copyright (C) 2009 - 2012 Paul Mundt
*
* This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
* License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
* for more details.
*/
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/bsearch.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include "internals.h"
......@@ -58,11 +59,6 @@ static void intc_disable(struct irq_data *data)
}
}
static int intc_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
{
return 0; /* allow wakeup, but setup hardware in intc_suspend() */
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* This is held with the irq desc lock held, so we don't require any
......@@ -78,7 +74,7 @@ static int intc_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
cpumask_copy(data->affinity, cpumask);
return 0;
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY;
}
#endif
......@@ -122,28 +118,12 @@ static struct intc_handle_int *intc_find_irq(struct intc_handle_int *hp,
unsigned int nr_hp,
unsigned int irq)
{
int i;
/*
* this doesn't scale well, but...
*
* this function should only be used for cerain uncommon
* operations such as intc_set_priority() and intc_set_type()
* and in those rare cases performance doesn't matter that much.
* keeping the memory footprint low is more important.
*
* one rather simple way to speed this up and still keep the
* memory footprint down is to make sure the array is sorted
* and then perform a bisect to lookup the irq.
*/
for (i = 0; i < nr_hp; i++) {
if ((hp + i)->irq != irq)
continue;
struct intc_handle_int key;
return hp + i;
}
key.irq = irq;
key.handle = 0;
return NULL;
return bsearch(&key, hp, nr_hp, sizeof(*hp), intc_handle_int_cmp);
}
int intc_set_priority(unsigned int irq, unsigned int prio)
......@@ -223,10 +203,9 @@ struct irq_chip intc_irq_chip = {
.irq_mask_ack = intc_mask_ack,
.irq_enable = intc_enable,
.irq_disable = intc_disable,
.irq_shutdown = intc_disable,
.irq_set_type = intc_set_type,
.irq_set_wake = intc_set_wake,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.irq_set_affinity = intc_set_affinity,
#endif
.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
};
......@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
* Shared interrupt handling code for IPR and INTC2 types of IRQs.
*
* Copyright (C) 2007, 2008 Magnus Damm
* Copyright (C) 2009, 2010 Paul Mundt
* Copyright (C) 2009 - 2012 Paul Mundt
*
* Based on intc2.c and ipr.c
*
......@@ -31,11 +31,12 @@
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include "internals.h"
LIST_HEAD(intc_list);
DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(intc_big_lock);
unsigned int nr_intc_controllers;
static unsigned int nr_intc_controllers;
/*
* Default priority level
......@@ -267,6 +268,9 @@ int __init register_intc_controller(struct intc_desc *desc)
k += save_reg(d, k, hw->prio_regs[i].set_reg, smp);
k += save_reg(d, k, hw->prio_regs[i].clr_reg, smp);
}
sort(d->prio, hw->nr_prio_regs, sizeof(*d->prio),
intc_handle_int_cmp, NULL);
}
if (hw->sense_regs) {
......@@ -277,6 +281,9 @@ int __init register_intc_controller(struct intc_desc *desc)
for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_sense_regs; i++)
k += save_reg(d, k, hw->sense_regs[i].reg, 0);
sort(d->sense, hw->nr_sense_regs, sizeof(*d->sense),
intc_handle_int_cmp, NULL);
}
if (hw->subgroups)
......
......@@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ static inline void activate_irq(int irq)
#endif
}
static inline int intc_handle_int_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
{
const struct intc_handle_int *_a = a;
const struct intc_handle_int *_b = b;
return _a->irq - _b->irq;
}
/* access.c */
extern unsigned long
(*intc_reg_fns[])(unsigned long addr, unsigned long h, unsigned long data);
......@@ -157,7 +165,6 @@ void _intc_enable(struct irq_data *data, unsigned long handle);
/* core.c */
extern struct list_head intc_list;
extern raw_spinlock_t intc_big_lock;
extern unsigned int nr_intc_controllers;
extern struct bus_type intc_subsys;
unsigned int intc_get_dfl_prio_level(void);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment