Commit 92da008f authored by Ben Gardon's avatar Ben Gardon Committed by Paolo Bonzini

Revert "KVM/MMU: Flush tlb directly in the kvm_zap_gfn_range()"

This reverts commit 71883a62.

The above commit contains an optimization to kvm_zap_gfn_range which
uses gfn-limited TLB flushes, if enabled. If using these limited flushes,
kvm_zap_gfn_range passes lock_flush_tlb=false to slot_handle_level_range
which creates a race when the function unlocks to call cond_resched.
See an example of this race below:

CPU 0                   CPU 1                           CPU 3
// zap_direct_gfn_range
mmu_lock()
// *ptep == pte_1
*ptep = 0
if (lock_flush_tlb)
        flush_tlbs()
mmu_unlock()
                        // In invalidate range
                        // MMU notifier
                        mmu_lock()
                        if (pte != 0)
                                *ptep = 0
                                flush = true
                        if (flush)
                                flush_remote_tlbs()
                        mmu_unlock()
                        return
                        // Host MM reallocates
                        // page previously
                        // backing guest memory.
                                                        // Guest accesses
                                                        // invalid page
                                                        // through pte_1
                                                        // in its TLB!!

Tested: Ran all kvm-unit-tests on a Intel Haswell machine with and
	without this patch. The patch introduced no new failures.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 71783e09
......@@ -5660,13 +5660,8 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
{
struct kvm_memslots *slots;
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
bool flush_tlb = true;
bool flush = false;
int i;
if (kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range())
flush_tlb = false;
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
......@@ -5678,17 +5673,12 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
if (start >= end)
continue;
flush |= slot_handle_level_range(kvm, memslot,
kvm_zap_rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL,
PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, start,
end - 1, flush_tlb);
slot_handle_level_range(kvm, memslot, kvm_zap_rmapp,
PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
start, end - 1, true);
}
}
if (flush)
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn_start,
gfn_end - gfn_start + 1);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment