Commit 93110be6 authored by Daniel Vetter's avatar Daniel Vetter

drm/doc: Overview documentation for drm_mm.c

kerneldoc polish will follow in the next patch.

Hopefully documenting the lru scan support a bit better spurs someone
to give this a shot in the ttm eviction code. At least in i915 it
helped quite a lot with memory thrashing on platforms where eviction
was (we've fixed that too meanwhile) fairly expensive.
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 79d11544
......@@ -920,6 +920,17 @@ struct drm_gem_object * (*gem_prime_import)(struct drm_device *dev,
<title>PRIME Function References</title>
!Edrivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>DRM MM Range Allocator</title>
<sect3>
<title>Overview</title>
!Pdrivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c Overview
</sect3>
<sect3>
<title>LRU Scan/Eviction Support</title>
!Pdrivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c lru scan roaster
</sect3>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<!-- Internals: mode setting -->
......
......@@ -47,6 +47,45 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
/**
* DOC: Overview
*
* drm_mm provides a simple range allocator. The drivers are free to use the
* resource allocator from the linux core if it suits them, the upside of drm_mm
* is that it's in the DRM core. Which means that it's easier to extend for
* some of the crazier special purpose needs of gpus.
*
* The main data struct is &drm_mm, allocations are tracked in &drm_mm_node.
* Drivers are free to embed either of them into their own suitable
* datastructures. drm_mm itself will not do any allocations of its own, so if
* drivers choose not to embed nodes they need to still allocate them
* themselves.
*
* The range allocator also supports reservation of preallocated blocks. This is
* useful for taking over initial mode setting configurations from the firmware,
* where an object needs to be created which exactly matches the firmware's
* scanout target. As long as the range is still free it can be inserted anytime
* after the allocator is initialized, which helps with avoiding looped
* depencies in the driver load sequence.
*
* drm_mm maintains a stack of most recently freed holes, which of all
* simplistic datastructures seems to be a fairly decent approach to clustering
* allocations and avoiding too much fragmentation. This means free space
* searches are O(num_holes). Given that all the fancy features drm_mm supports
* something better would be fairly complex and since gfx thrashing is a fairly
* steep cliff not a real concern. Removing a node again is O(1).
*
* drm_mm supports a few features: Alignment and range restrictions can be
* supplied. Further more every &drm_mm_node has a color value (which is just an
* opaqua unsigned long) which in conjunction with a driver callback can be used
* to implement sophisticated placement restrictions. The i915 DRM driver uses
* this to implement guard pages between incompatible caching domains in the
* graphics TT.
*
* Finally iteration helpers to walk all nodes and all holes are provided as are
* some basic allocator dumpers for debugging.
*/
static struct drm_mm_node *drm_mm_search_free_generic(const struct drm_mm *mm,
unsigned long size,
unsigned alignment,
......@@ -399,6 +438,34 @@ void drm_mm_replace_node(struct drm_mm_node *old, struct drm_mm_node *new)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mm_replace_node);
/**
* DOC: lru scan roaster
*
* Very often GPUs need to have continuous allocations for a given object. When
* evicting objects to make space for a new one it is therefore not most
* efficient when we simply start to select all objects from the tail of an LRU
* until there's a suitable hole: Especially for big objects or nodes that
* otherwise have special allocation constraints there's a good chance we evict
* lots of (smaller) objects unecessarily.
*
* The DRM range allocator supports this use-case through the scanning
* interfaces. First a scan operation needs to be initialized with
* drm_mm_init_scan() or drm_mm_init_scan_with_range(). The the driver adds
* objects to the roaster (probably by walking an LRU list, but this can be
* freely implemented) until a suitable hole is found or there's no further
* evitable object.
*
* The the driver must walk through all objects again in exactly the reverse
* order to restore the allocator state. Note that while the allocator is used
* in the scan mode no other operation is allowed.
*
* Finally the driver evicts all objects selected in the scan. Adding and
* removing an object is O(1), and since freeing a node is also O(1) the overall
* complexity is O(scanned_objects). So like the free stack which needs to be
* walked before a scan operation even begins this is linear in the number of
* objects. It doesn't seem to hurt badly.
*/
/**
* Initializa lru scanning.
*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment