Commit 95a3c23a authored by Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown Committed by Liam Girdwood

regulator: Optimise out noop voltage changes

If a consumer sets the same voltage range as is currently configured
for that consumer there's no need to run through setting the voltage
again. This pattern may occur with some CPUfreq implementations where
the same voltage range is used for multiple frequencies.
Reported-by: default avatarSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
parent 606a2562
......@@ -1697,10 +1697,17 @@ static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
int regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator *regulator, int min_uV, int max_uV)
{
struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
int ret;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
/* If we're setting the same range as last time the change
* should be a noop (some cpufreq implementations use the same
* voltage for multiple frequencies, for example).
*/
if (regulator->min_uV == min_uV && regulator->max_uV == max_uV)
goto out;
/* sanity check */
if (!rdev->desc->ops->set_voltage &&
!rdev->desc->ops->set_voltage_sel) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment