Commit 9af02d86 authored by Jeffy Chen's avatar Jeffy Chen Committed by Marcel Holtmann

btmrvl: avoid double-disable_irq() race

It's much the same as what we did for mwifiex in:
b9da4d22 mwifiex: avoid double-disable_irq() race

"We have a race where the wakeup IRQ might be in flight while we're
calling mwifiex_disable_wake() from resume(). This can leave us
disabling the IRQ twice.

Let's disable the IRQ and enable it in case if we have double-disabled
it."
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
parent 9dcbc313
......@@ -1682,8 +1682,12 @@ static int btmrvl_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
/* Disable platform specific wakeup interrupt */
if (card->plt_wake_cfg && card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt >= 0) {
disable_irq_wake(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
if (!card->plt_wake_cfg->wake_by_bt)
disable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
disable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
if (card->plt_wake_cfg->wake_by_bt)
/* Undo our disable, since interrupt handler already
* did this.
*/
enable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
}
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment