Commit 9c5d58fb authored by Jeff Layton's avatar Jeff Layton Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: convert swap_inode_data() over to use swap() on most of the fields

For some odd reason, it forces a byte-by-byte copy of each field. A
plain old swap() on most of these fields would be more efficient. We
do need to retain the memswap of i_data however as that field is an array.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent 191eac33
...@@ -64,18 +64,16 @@ static void swap_inode_data(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2) ...@@ -64,18 +64,16 @@ static void swap_inode_data(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
ei1 = EXT4_I(inode1); ei1 = EXT4_I(inode1);
ei2 = EXT4_I(inode2); ei2 = EXT4_I(inode2);
memswap(&inode1->i_flags, &inode2->i_flags, sizeof(inode1->i_flags)); swap(inode1->i_flags, inode2->i_flags);
memswap(&inode1->i_version, &inode2->i_version, swap(inode1->i_version, inode2->i_version);
sizeof(inode1->i_version)); swap(inode1->i_blocks, inode2->i_blocks);
memswap(&inode1->i_blocks, &inode2->i_blocks, swap(inode1->i_bytes, inode2->i_bytes);
sizeof(inode1->i_blocks)); swap(inode1->i_atime, inode2->i_atime);
memswap(&inode1->i_bytes, &inode2->i_bytes, sizeof(inode1->i_bytes)); swap(inode1->i_mtime, inode2->i_mtime);
memswap(&inode1->i_atime, &inode2->i_atime, sizeof(inode1->i_atime));
memswap(&inode1->i_mtime, &inode2->i_mtime, sizeof(inode1->i_mtime));
memswap(ei1->i_data, ei2->i_data, sizeof(ei1->i_data)); memswap(ei1->i_data, ei2->i_data, sizeof(ei1->i_data));
memswap(&ei1->i_flags, &ei2->i_flags, sizeof(ei1->i_flags)); swap(ei1->i_flags, ei2->i_flags);
memswap(&ei1->i_disksize, &ei2->i_disksize, sizeof(ei1->i_disksize)); swap(ei1->i_disksize, ei2->i_disksize);
ext4_es_remove_extent(inode1, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS); ext4_es_remove_extent(inode1, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS);
ext4_es_remove_extent(inode2, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS); ext4_es_remove_extent(inode2, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment