Commit 9f3045ec authored by Paul Gortmaker's avatar Paul Gortmaker

irq: hide debug macros so they don't collide with others.

The file kernel/irq/debug.h temporarily defines P, PS, PD
and then undefines them.  However these names aren't really
"internal" enough, and collide with other more legit users
such as the ones in the xtensa arch, causing:

In file included from kernel/irq/internals.h:58:0,
                 from kernel/irq/irqdesc.c:18:
kernel/irq/debug.h:8:0: warning: "PS" redefined [enabled by default]
arch/xtensa/include/asm/regs.h:59:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition

Add a handful of underscores to do a better job of hiding these
temporary macros.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
parent bfae8ee8
......@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#define P(f) if (desc->status_use_accessors & f) printk("%14s set\n", #f)
#define PS(f) if (desc->istate & f) printk("%14s set\n", #f)
#define ___P(f) if (desc->status_use_accessors & f) printk("%14s set\n", #f)
#define ___PS(f) if (desc->istate & f) printk("%14s set\n", #f)
/* FIXME */
#define PD(f) do { } while (0)
#define ___PD(f) do { } while (0)
static inline void print_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
......@@ -23,23 +23,23 @@ static inline void print_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)desc->action->handler);
}
P(IRQ_LEVEL);
P(IRQ_PER_CPU);
P(IRQ_NOPROBE);
P(IRQ_NOREQUEST);
P(IRQ_NOTHREAD);
P(IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
___P(IRQ_LEVEL);
___P(IRQ_PER_CPU);
___P(IRQ_NOPROBE);
___P(IRQ_NOREQUEST);
___P(IRQ_NOTHREAD);
___P(IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
PS(IRQS_AUTODETECT);
PS(IRQS_REPLAY);
PS(IRQS_WAITING);
PS(IRQS_PENDING);
___PS(IRQS_AUTODETECT);
___PS(IRQS_REPLAY);
___PS(IRQS_WAITING);
___PS(IRQS_PENDING);
PD(IRQS_INPROGRESS);
PD(IRQS_DISABLED);
PD(IRQS_MASKED);
___PD(IRQS_INPROGRESS);
___PD(IRQS_DISABLED);
___PD(IRQS_MASKED);
}
#undef P
#undef PS
#undef PD
#undef ___P
#undef ___PS
#undef ___PD
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment